About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact the Docs

Docs on Twitter


Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat_165
Juristat #8 Overall Rank

Pharma-50-transparent_216px_red

« Court Report | Main | Supreme Court Denies Amgen Certiorari Petition to Reverse Cybor »

May 13, 2007

Comments

I just came across this... and for months, I've been thinking along the same line. However, it seems that the proposed legislation is getting rid of 103(b). I've asked many about this. Some say it's an oversight, others say it is not necessary anymore because of Brouwer and Ochiai. My questions are (1) is the proposed legislation deleting 103(b) and (2) is it really not necessary today?

Dear Amoeba:

I am not aware of any efforts to overturn this aspect of the proposed patent law provisions, but I suppose just about anything may be fair game.

Brouwer and Ochiai have traditionally been cited as making 103(b) less relevant (as well as extending the provisions of the statute to subject matter not encompassed within the language of the statute).

In view of the way the courts are going with this, however, I think the statute prevents the PTO, the CAFC and the USSC from applying the obviousness "flavor of the week" to this subject matter, and that's why I think it's still necessary.

Thanks for the post.

The comments to this entry are closed.

January 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31