About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.
2018 Juristant Badge - MBHB_165
Juristat #4 Overall Rank

E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Contact the Docs


  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.
Juristat #8 Overall Rank


« Court Report | Main | Stem Cells a Go! in California »

February 28, 2007


While by no means a critic of embryonic stem cell research, it strikes me that the approach taken with adult stem cells, and more so the coverage of the issue, is not unlike the approach of the creationist scientist – setting the goal in research to match political ends. That is, given the typically hopeless and dour description in articles about adult stem cells, one wonders: if science had somehow never discovered embryonic stem cells, would the outlook and the discussion surrounding adult stem cell lines be much more optimistic and forward looking than it is? As it is, I certainly understand why setbacks in adult stem cell research strengthen the argument in favor of embryonic stem cell research, and I understand that there are many legitimate obstacles in using adult stem cells. I just think that we need to avoid linking the two so much that it affects our objectivity. This piece, for example, seems like it will be a neutral article reporting a failure of science, but turns out to be a very pointed critique of current policies – as *all* such articles seem to be these days. Hey, I agree with the point made, but that doesn't mean we should root for this result; we should at least be very wary of hoping our science matches our desired outcomes.

The comments to this entry are closed.

May 2024

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31