E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact the Docs

Docs on Twitter


About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.

Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.

Pharma-50-transparent_216px_red

Become a Fan

« Amgen v. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Remaining Issues | Main | In re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation (Fed. Cir. 2008) »

October 14, 2008

Comments

Of the text --neither the Senator's website nor his 83-page "Blueprint for Change" (available at his website) make any mention of such [gold-plated] patents.-- please note that the Obama site obama.3cdn.net DOES make mention of "gold-plated" patents. This and some other matters are discussed in the post at Intellectual Property Today on 26 Sept 08 titled On Aspects of Barack Obama’s Technology Policy available at
http://www.iptoday.com/news-article.asp?id=2976&type=ip. A version will appear in the Nov. 2008 issue of Intellectual Property Today.

As an Obama supporter, I am disappointed to see that he is consulting with Professors Rai and Lemley, because I strongly disagree with previous statements they have made about the patent system and the PTO. On the other hand, Professor Rai's comments above sound much more reasonable and less anti-applicant than the points made in the amicus brief she recently submitted along with Professor Lemley in Tafas v. Dudas. This might suggest that academics feel pressure to write articles or submit briefs that are more controversial than their actual views in order to attract attention, or it might suggest that Professor Rai was self-censoring when speaking in a public forum (or perhaps it suggests neither of these things), but in any event I am hopeful that Senator Obama's advisors are capable of giving him objective advice. I also like Professor Lessig's suggestion about subject matter limitations, since that might resolve the current disagreement between biotech/pharma and the computer industries, but it seems like the kind of thing that might be hard to design and implement since there might be significant incentives for having subject matter fit into certain categories.

FYI. The Toledo Intellecual Property Law Association is showing a recording of the panel discussion that took place in Denver on August 28th, at the University of Toledo, School of Law auditorium tomorrow at noon. The event is open to the public. See: http://toledopatentlaw.wordpress.com/2008/10/13/intellectual-property-policy-and-the-presidential-campaign/

The comments to this entry are closed.

March 2017

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31