E-mail Newsletter

  • Enter your e-mail address below to receive the "Patent Docs" e-mail newsletter.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Contact the Docs

Docs on Twitter


About the Authors

  • The Authors and Contributors of "Patent Docs" are patent attorneys and agents, many of whom hold doctorates in a diverse array of disciplines.

Disclaimer

  • "Patent Docs" does not contain any legal advice whatsoever. This weblog is for informational purposes only, and its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship. In addition, nothing on "Patent Docs" constitutes a solicitation for business. This weblog is intended primarily for other attorneys. Moreover, "Patent Docs" is the personal weblog of the Authors; it is not edited by the Authors' employers or clients and, as such, no part of this weblog may be so attributed. All posts on "Patent Docs" should be double-checked for their accuracy and current applicability.

  • Law Blogs

Become a Fan

« University of Pittsburgh v. Hedrick (C.D. Cal. 2008) | Main | CBO Releases Report on Senate Follow-on Biologics Bill; BIO Calls for Congress to Pass Biologics Bill in 2008 »

June 30, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451ca1469e200e5537e3d788833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Biotech/Pharma Lobbying Scoreboard - Part II:

Comments

Are the pharma bribe numbers bigger than the "tech firm" bribe numbers???
After all, patent reform is NOT about the merits but only about which players have more $$$ to purchase votes, ehr, lobby congress.
Could you compare these numbers with the bribe checks of CPF members????

The comments to this entry are closed.

September 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30